Gage

Gage v. Billing

Good Law
12 Cal. App. 688·1910 Cal. App. LEXIS 300·108 P. 664
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 4, 1910Civ. No. 704.California2,074 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hall, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

It is alleged in the complaint “That within two years last past the defendant became indebted to one Emil Pohli for and on account of services rendered by said Pohli to said defendant as said defendant’s attorney at law, at said defendant’s special instance and request, in the sum of $2,000, the said last-mentioned sum being the reasonable value of said services.” Plaintiff sued as assignee of Pohli. Upon demand of defendant, plaintiff furnished a bill of particulars, in which he sets out three charges or items: The first item is

for counsel and advice in regard to certain matters specified in the item, for which a charge is made of $500.

The second item is for “services of said Emil Pohli, said plaintiff’s assignor, in obtaining a proposition to purchase from said defendant, or from a corporation to be formed by said defendant, the right to all the lime deposits in and upon the San Vicente Ranch, the property of the Santa Cruz Lime Company,” for which a charge is made in the sum of $1,000.

The third item is for services in interviews with defendant and his agents, and other services set forth, for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.