Borgmeyer
Borgmeyer v. Solomon
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Conrey, J.
This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover fees alleged to be due to him from the defendant on a contract for professional services which were rendered by the plaintiff as an architect. [1] It was found by the court that the defendant employed the plaintiff as such architect to prepare plans and specifications for the erection of a hotel building at a described location in the city of Los Angeles, and agreed to pay therefor the sum of nine hundred dollars, which sum was to cover the cost of superintending the erection and construction of the building; also that the plaintiff prepared plans and specifications, as required by the defendant, and has at all times been ready, willing, and able to perform the services of superintending the erection and construction of the said building, but the defendant has refused and still refuses to erect and construct said hotel building in accordance with the plans and specifications prepared by the plaintiff, and has refused to pay, etc. Judgment was gendered in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals therefrom.
Appellant contends that the findings above mentioned are not sustained by the evidence. In support of his contention…