Mulvihill

Sam Aftergut Co. v. Mulvihill

Good Law
1914 Cal. App. LEXIS 278·25 Cal. App. 784·145 P. 728
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 19, 1914Civ. No. 1408.California820 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff upon a nonsuit granted upon motion of the defendant.

The action is one to recover the sum of $1474, the value of milk sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant. The facts of the case are briefly as follows: After some negotiations the parties to this action agreed .orally that the plaintiff should sell and that the defendant should purchase a certain quantity of milk a day for a fixed price for a period of six months; and one of the stipulations of the oral arrangement was that the agreement thus arrived at should be reduced to writing and signed by both parties. It was accordingly reduced to writing, signed by the defendant, and left with McGuire & Son, milk brokers, to be signed by one Sam Aftergut, the president of the plaintiff corporation, some time when he should happen to be at the office of McGuire & Son. The contract, however, was never signed by Aftergut nor by any one on behalf of the plaintiff, nor is it shown that the plaintiff even knew that it had been signed by the defendant. After delivering milk to the defendant for five or six weeks in the quantity specified in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.