Piazza

People v. Piazza

Good Law
1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 115·59 Cal. App. 43·209 P. 1017
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 1922Civ. No. 2530.California782 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Finch, J.

This action was instituted under the “Red-light Abatement Act” (Stats. 1913, p. 20). The judgment rendered in the action declares a certain two-story building owned by defendant Piazza “to be a building where lewdness, assignation and prostitution was, at the timb of the filing of the complaint herein, carried on, and was then and there a public nuisance,” and, further, orders that the sheriff “be, and he is hereby authorized and directed forthwith to remove all occupants from said building and to remove all personal property therefrom and to keep said building closed for a period of one (1) year, or until released as provided by law.” Prom this judgment Piazza appealed. He thereupon filed his petition herein for a writ of supersedeas, alleging that the trial court “refused to stay execution on said judgment, upon the ground of want of jurisdiction so to do,” and that “unless a writ of supersedeas is granted staying execution on said judgment until the final determination of said appeal, petitioner will lose the sum of two hundred ($200.00) dollars per month in rental for said premises until the final determination of said appeal.” It is not contended that the appeal operates as a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.