Marx & Rawolle v. Standard Soap Co.

Good Law
42 Cal. App. 32·183 P. 225
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 30, 1919Civ. No. 2813.California1,435 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Richards, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant in an action instituted by the plaintiff to recover damages from the defendant for the alleged repudiation of a contract for the sale by the defendant to the plaintiff of twelve carloads of crude glycerine. The contract upon which plaintiff relies for a recovery was claimed by it to have been created through an interchange of telegrams and letters passing between the defendant and certain middlemen acting as brokers for the purpose of purchasing the product in question for the use and benefit of the plaintiff. These middlemen were the Zimmerman, Alder-son, Carr Commission Company, having offices in Chicago and New York, the plaintiff being a business concern located in the latter city. The defense relied upon by the respondent on the trial and upon this appeal is that the letters and telegrams referred to did not amount to a completed written agreement for the sale of said product, and that the defendant withdrew from the negotiation before the parties had arrived at and consummated a final and binding contract in the premises. The trial court, upon the conclusion of all of the evidence presented on both sides of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.