Burmester

Burmester v. Horn

Good Law
1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 470·35 Cal. App. 549·170 P. 674
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 12, 1917Civ. No. 2239.California1,245 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kerrigan, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant in an action brought to recover from him a sum of money paid by the plaintiffs on account of the purchase price of real and personal property situated in Sonoma County.

A brief account of the facts of the case is as follows: On January 14, 1913, Antonia Brandt, being the owner of the real property described in the complaint and of certain personal property, made a bill of sale and deed thereof to John W. Horn, the defendant, in consideration of which Horn entered into an agreement with her whereby within thirty days he was to pay her the sum of one thousand five hundred dollars, to be derived from a mortgage upon the property, and thereafter the sum of twenty-five dollars per month without interest for the period of seventy-six months if she lived during that period, otherwise the payments to cease at her death. Time was not made of the essence of the contract, nor did it provide, as is quite usual in similar contracts, for a forfeiture of the vendee’s rights in ease the installment payments were not punctually made.

Thereafter, on February 3, 1913, Horn agreed in writing to sell and convey to Otto Burmester and Cora…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.