Nash

People v. Nash

Good Law
15 Cal. App. 320·1911 Cal. App. LEXIS 358·114 P. 784
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 1911Crim. No. 234.California2,777 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hall, J.

This is an appeal by the people from a judgment for defendant entered upon demurrer to an indictment charging him with a felony.

Respondent in his brief raises the point that this court has no jurisdiction of the appeal because not taken in accordance with the law in force at the time it was taken.

Upon being arraigned the defendant filed a demurrer to the indictment, which was by the court overruled. The defendant entered a plea of “not guilty,” and the cause came on for trial. A jury was impaneled and some testimony taken, when, after certain objections made by defendant to the introduction of certain testimony had been sustained by the court, the court, upon motion of counsel for defendant, in which the district attorney joined, and with the consent of defendant given personally in open court, discharged the jury from further consideration of the cause. It further appears from the bill of exceptions that this course was taken in order that defendant might be allowed to withdraw his plea of “not guilty” and file a supplemental demurrer. Not only did the defendant in person and through his attorney consent to the discharge of the jury, but also in person and by his attorney…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.