Ewens

Ewens v. Newman

Good Law
131 Cal. App. 602·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 843·21 P.2d 1007
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 4, 1933Docket No. 7647.California834 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Henderson, J.

The defendants Newman and Saavedra appeal from a judgment for $12,500, entered against them on the verdict of a jury as damages for the wrongful death of Git Wong, the father of three minor children, "as the result of injuries sustained by him as a passenger in an automobile hired from the defendant Newman, and negligently operated by his employee, the defendant Saavedra. This action was brought by the respondent, in her representative capacity, for the benefit of the three minor children, pursuant to the provisions of section 377 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

It is urged that the evidence shows no negligence on the part of defendants proximately causing the accident, and that, on the contrary, the testimony clearly shows that it was a case of unavoidable accident. Briefly stated, the testimony, which was conflicting, showed the following facts most favorable to plaintiffs: The accident occurred at the intersection of Main and Thirty-first Streets in the city of Los Angeles as the result of the collision of an automobile, occupied by decedent and driven by appellant Saavedra in a northerly direction on said Main Street with an automobile driven by defendant Patterson in an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.