Ex Parte Hatch

Good Law
15 Cal. App. 186·1911 Cal. App. LEXIS 227·114 P. 410
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 11, 1911Crim. No. 311.California521 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

This is a petition by Frank L. Hatch, on behalf of Jackson Hatch, for a writ of habeas corpus.

Petitioner invokes the writ for the purpose of procuring an order admitting said Jackson Hatch to bail pending an appeal to this court from a judgment of conviction and a sentence of imprisonment for felony embezzlement made and entered in the superior court of the county of Santa Clara.

Admission to bail pending an appeal from a judgment of conviction and a sentence of imprisonment for a felony is not a matter of right. (Pen. Code, see. 1272.) It is a matter resting in and controlled by a sound legal discretion, which should be exercised in favor of a convicted person only when circumstances of an extraordinary character have intervened. (Ex parte Marks, 49 Cal. 681 ; Ex parte Smallman, 54 Cal. 35 ; Ex parte Brown, 68 Cal. 177 , [ 8 Pac. 829 ]; Ex parte Smith, 89 Cal. 79 , [ 26 Pac. 638 ]; Ex parte Turner, 112 Cal. 627 , [ 45 Pac. 571 ].) The determination of an application to be admitted to bail pending an appeal from a judgment of conviction should, primarily, be left to the judgment of the trial court wherein the conviction was had, and such court’s determination of the matter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.