Funcheon

Woods Leasing Co. v. Funcheon

Good Law
134 Cal. App. 111·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 95·25 P.2d 47
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 1933Docket No. 1057.California3,552 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Marks, J.

In January, 1931, the plaintiff, Woods Leasing Company, instituted its action against Glen and Mary E. Funcheon to recover possession of the furniture and furnishings of the Aztec Court in the city of San Diego, or their value, together with damages for their detention. The action was founded upon its alleged ownership and right of possession of the personal property. The answer of the defendants denies the ownership and right of possession of the plaintiff and alleges right of possession in themselves under the terms of a chattel mortgage. They filed a cross-complaint seeking to foreclose the chattel mortgage, alleging an unpaid balance of $34,634.79 due upon a promissory note secured by this chattel mortgage. The trial court gave judgment for the plaintiff for the possession of the personal property, or, in case possession could not be had, its value in the sum of $1500, together with $1500 damages for its wrongful detention.

As we view the case it will finally turn upon the question of whether a finding of the trial court that the promissory note described in the cross-complaint had been fully paid, satisfied and discharged, is supported by the evidence. The facts presented by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.