Beach

Beach v. Waite

Good Law
1913 Cal. App. LEXIS 314·21 Cal. App. 304·131 P. 880
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 1913Civ. No. 965.California1,464 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

James, J.

On February 7, 1908, M. P. Waite, one of the defendants in this action, executed his promissory note for one thousand five hundred dollars in favor of Norvin R. Strobridge and Selma S. Strobridge, which note was made pay able six months after date, with interest at the rate of eight per cent per annum, and which provided for the payment of attorneys’ fees in the event of suit. To secure the payment of this note a mortgage was given covering certain lots of land in the county of Kern. On February 20th Waite sold this land to one Mullen, the deed of conveyance containing a recital that the land was subject to the Strobridge mortgage which the vendee assumed and agreed to discharge. On August 18, 1908, the mortgage debt not having been paid, action was brought by the mortgagees to obtain judgment of foreclosure and for any deficiency that might result upon sale of the property. On the eighteenth day of August, 1908, notice of the bringing of this action was duly recorded in Kern County. Waite’s grantee, Mullen, who, with Waite*, was made a party defendant in the foreclosure action and being a necessary party thereto, could not be found within the state of California and service of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.