Diggins

Pacific Paving Co. v. Diggins

Good Law
1906 Cal. App. LEXIS 44·4 Cal. App. 240·87 P. 415
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 15, 1906Civ. No. 214.California1,515 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Harrison, J.

Action upon a street assessment in San Francisco. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant Byron Biggins, and upon the motion of the said defendant the court granted a new trial. The present appeal is from this order.

The complaint is in the ordinary form except that there is no averment therein that the board of supervisors had passed a resolution of intention to order the improvement for which the assessment was made. In his answer thereto the defendant, for a separate and special defense to the action, alleged that the resolution ordering the work referred to in the complaint was not duly passed by the board of supervisors; that it was passed by the board November 29, 1897; that more than six months prior to said date the board passed a resolution of intention to order such work, but that within ten days after the expiration of the time of the posting and publication of the notice thereof the owners of a majority of the frontage of the property fronting on said proposed work made and delivered to the clerk of said board a written objection and protest thereto, upon which the clerk indorsed the date of its reception by him; that no further…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.