Thompson

Thompson v. Scholl

Good Law
1916 Cal. App. LEXIS 235·32 Cal. App. 4·161 P. 1006
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 8, 1916Civ. No. 2013.California483 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Conrey, J.

In this action plaintiff seeks to obtain a decree enforcing specific performance of an alleged contract for the sale of real property. The defendant Bessie L. Scholl appeals from the judgment and from an order denying her motion for a new trial.

The complaint alleged ownership by the defendant of the land described therein; that on August 26, 1912, she appointed one I. C. Butler as her agent to sell said property, the authorization being in writing as follows:

It is further alleged that within thirty days thereafter, and prior to any revocation of the authority, Butler did, as agent of the defendant and on her behalf, sell to the plaintiff the described property for the sum of ten thousand dollars, to be paid in cash. Other allegations follow showing what was done by and between Butler and Scholl, and other usual and necessary allegations of a complaint for specific performance. The defendant demurred to the complaint upon the ground -that the same did not' state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and upon other grounds, and the demurrer was overruled. After answer, the case was tried, with resulting findings and judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

The complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.