Hunt

Hunt v. Inner Harbor Land Co.

Good Law
61 Cal. App. 271·214 P. 998
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 5, 1923Civ. No. 3714.California869 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Finlayson, J.

This is an action to recover moneys which plaintiff had paid to defendant as part of the agreed purchase price under a written contract of sale whereby defendant had agreed to convey and plaintiff had agreed to purchase a certain parcel of land in Los Angeles County. Subsequent to the contract and to the payment of the moneys sought to he recovered, a condemnation action was commenced by the Los Angeles Flood Control District to condemn the land for flood control purposes. In its contract to convey defendant covenanted to deliver to plaintiff, upon payment of the agreed purchase price, “a good and sufficient deed of grant, bargain and sale to said property, and also a certificate of .title showing title to the same vested in the grantor or grantors in said deed.” This covenant calls for a good title to the land, unencumbered and free from defect. (Haynes v. White, 55 Cal. 38; Easton v. Montgomery, 90 Cal. 307, 314 [ 25 Am. St. Rep. 123 , 27 Pac. 280 ].) The pendency of the condemnation action is an encumbrance upon the title. (Block v. Citizens Trust etc. Bank, 57 Cal. App. 518 [ 207 Pac. 510].) Subsequent to the commencement of the condemnation suit and prior to bringing this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.