Norvall

People v. Norvall

Good Law
1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 350·57 Cal. App. 256·206 P. 1116
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 4, 1922Crim. No. 602.California274 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Burnett, J.

The charging part of the information against defendant was as follows: “The said C. L, Norvall on or about the 25th day of April, A. D. 1921, at and in the county of Tehama, and State of California and prior to the filing of this information, willfully and unlawfully did practice, attempt to practice and advertise and hold herself out as practicing a system or mode of treating the sick and afflicted in this State, without having at. the time of so doing, a valid unrevoked certificate from the Board of Medical Examiners of the State of California. ’ ’ She was regularly tried and convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of three hundred dollars, with the alternative of imprisonment in the county jail at the rate of one day’s imprisonment for every two dollars of said fine remaining unpaid.

We find no error in the record. The proceedings seem to have been entirely regular and in accordance with the requirements of the law. The jury were correctly instructed by the learned trial judge. The evidence supports the verdict and no reason has been shown, nor does any occur to us, after an examination of the record, why there should be any interference with the judgment. No doubt if counsel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.