Stewart

Stewart v. Smith

Good Law
1907 Cal. App. LEXIS 168·6 Cal. App. 152·91 P. 667
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 30, 1907Civ. No. 345.California4,154 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Burnett, J.

The action is in equity to compel specific performance of a contract to make a certain testamentary dis position of property. Two of the plaintiffs are children and the other two are daughters of a deceased child of James S. Stewart and Annie Stewart, decedents. All the other heirs, legatees and devisees of said Annie Stewart, deceased, are made defendants.

It appears from the complaint that said James S. Stewart, at the time of his death in 1870, left property, real and personal, of the value of $17,000. All claims against the estate did not exceed the sum of $1,000. In the same year Annie Stewart, widow of said James S. Stewart, was appointed administratrix of his estate and remained such until the administration of the estate was closed, April 8, 1893. All the estate of said James S. Stewart was community property. Some time in the year 1873 the said Annie Stewart, “for her better maintenance and support during her life, orally solicited and requested her said sons, John H. Stewart and Charles E. Stewart and her said daughter Elizabeth Reilay (nee Stewart), deceased, mother of said plaintiffs, Luella M. Reilay and Mabel S. Kellogg (nee Reilay), to deed, sell, assign and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.