Ross

Exchange National Bank v. Ross

Good Law
17 Cal. App. 235·119 P. 398
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 13, 1911Civ. No. 951.California1,692 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

James, J.

Action brought upon five promissory notes, each being for the sum of $300, executed by defendant and made payable to S. A. Sanderson or order. These notes were negotiable in form, but were given to represent a certain indebtedness arising upon a contract for the purchase of real property. On June 28, 1906, defendant and S. A. Sanderson entered into a written contract whereby Sanderson agreed to sell' and defendant to buy portions of two lots of land in the city of Long Beach. The contract provided that the defendant should pay a total sum of $2,250 for the property, and that he was to receive a clear title thereto. The promissory notes were given as evidence of the partial payments to become due under the contract, it being provided in the latter instrument that the sum of $300 should be paid by defendant Boss upon the execution of the contract, and the further sums of $300 every six months thereafter, except that the final payment of $150 was to be made three months after the last in-’ stallment of $300 became due. On April 26, 1907, Sanderson assigned the contract, together with the promissory notes incident thereto, to the plaintiff bank as collateral security for the payment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.