Martin

Martin v. Stone

Good Law
15 Cal. App. 174·1911 Cal. App. LEXIS 229·113 P. 706
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 1911Civ. No. 787.California1,147 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

James, J.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment entered against him in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $1,904.46; also an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

In March, 1903, an option was obtained in the name of defendant from Elizabeth Hollenbeck, whereby the right to purchase one hundred and forty-five acres of land in Los Angeles county was given by the said Elizabeth Hollenbeck. Plaintiff and defendant each owned a one-half interest in this option. They each endeavored to negotiate a sale of the option, and the efforts of plaintiff in that direction were successful. The option was sold to Strong and Dickinson, real estate brokers. Plaintiff and defendant shared equally in the profits of the sale, which amounted to $75 on each acre of land covered by the option. At' the time plaintiff negotiated the sale of the option, he also obtained an agreement from Strong and Dickinson, which recited that, in consideration of the opportunity to purchase the option being presented to the real estate brokers, they would pay to plaintiff one-eighth of the net profits to be obtained on the sale of the property. Defendant was not informed of the fact that plaintiff had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.