Evans
Evans v. Hindes
Opinion
Lead Opinion
The plaintiff, as assignee of E. J. Davis, a real estate broker, sues to recover a sum which he claims as a balance due upon a commission for effecting an exchange of properties for the defendant.
It is conceded that Davis was entitled under the contract as written to a commission for his services amounting to the sum of $1,650, but it is contended by the defendant that Davis agreed to accept in liquidation of his claim the proceeds of a certain potato crop, and that such proceeds having been turned over to him, the obligation under the contract was discharged, although Davis received only the sum of $670 as such proceeds.
The contract for the broker’s commission is in the usual form and subscribed by the defendant. Immediately following it, and apparently on the same sheet of paper, and doubtless executed on the same day, is the following addenda:
“I, the undersigned, accept the above employment, and agree to extend the time of payment until such time as the crop is harvested, it being mutually understood that when the crop is sold, the proceeds to amount of sixteen hundred fifty ($1650.00) dollars is to be turned over to me in liquidation of above indebtedness.