Finnerty

Finnerty v. Cummings

Good Law
132 Cal. App. 48·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 237·22 P.2d 37
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 17, 1933Docket No. 8790.California831 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Gray, J.

In a prior action respondent’s minor daughter, appearing by respondent as her guardian ad litem, recovered a judgment against appellant for injuries received in an automobile accident. Subsequently respondent brought this action to recover for her loss of her daughter’s earnings and for medical expenses incurred in treating her daughter's injuries. Appellant, in addition to other defenses, pleaded that the first judgment was res judicata of the second action. The court found adversely to appellant on this plea and rendered judgment against him. From this judgment appellant appeals, claiming that his plea of res judicata should have been upheld.

“ Among other requirements of a judgment pleaded in bar is this: that the action must be between the same parties in the same capacity and the judgment must be ‘in respect to the matter directly adjudged’. (Code Civ. Proc., subd. 2, sec. 1908; Laguna etc. Dist. v. Charles Martin Co., 5 Cal. App. 172 [ 89 Pac. 993 ] ; Hughes v. United States, 4 Wall. 232 [ 18 L. Ed. 303 ].)” (Elliott v. Hudson, 18 Cal. App. 642, 653 [ 124 Pac. 103, 108 ].) Since respondent appeared in the first action as guardian to enforce her daughter’s right and in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.