Duncan

Duncan v. Dormer

Good Law
1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 666·94 Cal. App. 218·270 P. 1003
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 1, 1928Docket No. 3534.California1,014 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Thompson, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants in an action for labor performed and materials furnished. The complaint contained four separate counts. The first cause of action charged the defendants George M. Dormer, William J. Larkin and his wife Emma, as copartners doing business under the fictitious name of Emma Belle Mines Company, with being indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $1,750 for labor performed. The second count alleged an indebtedness of $197 against the same defendants, in the same capacity, for materials furnished. The third cause was against these same defendants, for the same amounts, as trustees of the Emma Belle Mines Company. The last count was against the same defendants, as individuals, for the same value of said services and materials furnished. The trial was in the nature .of an accounting, nearly every item of which was contested. February 28, 1923, the defendants were organized as an express trust for the purpose of operating an oil mining enterprise at Kelso. About the middle of May, 1923, the defendant William J. Larkin met and employed appellant to take charge of their plant as manager. The amount of his salary is in dispute.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.