Burr

Burr v. Gardella

Good Law
1921 Cal. App. LEXIS 312·53 Cal. App. 377·200 P. 493
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 30, 1921Civ. No. 2304.California6,714 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hart, J.

The plaintiff, in the month of June, 1914, entered into a contract with the state of California, through and by its department of engineering, whereby the former agreed to construct a portion of a state highway in Butte County, “between Lindo Channel, one and one-half miles north of Chico, and the northerly county boundary—Division 3, Route 3, Section D.” On the fifteenth day of April, 1915, the plaintiff and the defendant Keith made and entered into a written agreement, by the terms of which said Keith, for a certain specified consideration, was to haul and transport or carry from Cana or “any other point on the line of the Southern Pacific Railroad or Northern Electric Railroad,” where the State Highway Commission may deliver the same, certain materials (mineral aggregate) necessary to be used in the construction of said portion of said state highway by the plaintiff under his contract with the state of California. Among the provisions of the contract between plaintiff and Keith is the following, after specifically setting forth the sums to be paid to and received by said Keith for the transportation and delivery of said materials as provided therein: “Said payment shall be made…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.