Silveira

Silveira v. Siegfried

Good Law
135 Cal. App. 218·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 313·26 P.2d 666
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 8, 1933Docket No. 8826.California1,068 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Action to recover damages suffered by plaintiff in an automobile collision. The accident occurred at or near the intersection of Coleridge and Waverly Streets in the city of Palo Alto. There was a conflict in the evidence as to the rate of speed the different cars were traveling when they entered the intersection, and also as to which entered the intersection first. Plaintiff recovered judgment against defendant based on the verdict of a jury in the sum of $5,000. Defendant moved for a new trial on all the statutory grounds. The motion was denied. This is an appeal from the judgment and order.

The appeal is based solely upon claimed erroneous instructions given to the jury at the request of respondent. The complaint alleges negligence. This was denied by the answer, and contributory negligence was pleaded as a separate defense. The trial court gave numerous instructions upon the subject of contributory negligence, to the correctness of which no complaint is made. It is claimed, however, that the court gave other instructions upon the subject which omitted or misstated this defense. Upon this subject, except as hereinafter stated, the court fully and fairly instructed the jury.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.