Singh

People v. Singh

Good Law
121 Cal. App. 107·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 1186·8 P.2d 898
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 1932Docket No. 130.California693 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Mar, J.

The district attorney of Fresno County filed two informations in the court below charging Mangal Singh with felonies. One charged the defendant with committing the crime of sodomy upon a fifteen year old boy whom we will hereafter refer to as Vernon. The other information contained two counts, the first of which charged him with attempting to commit sodomy upon a boy whom we will refer to as Boyd, who was thirteen years old at the time of the commission of the offense, and the second charged the commission of the same crime upon a boy whom we will refer to as Clarence. The cases were consolidated and tried together and are before us on a single record.

At the close of the People’s case the charge involving the boy Clarence was dismissed. The defendant then moved the trial court to peremptorily instruct the jury to acquit him because each boy was shown to be an accomplice and there was no evidence corroborating his testimony as required by section 1111 of the Penal Code. The motion was granted and the jury instructed accordingly. The jury refused to follow the instructions and found the defendant guilty of both offenses. On motion for new trial the court below granted the motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.