Hanson

Respondents have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal and affirm the judgment upon the ground that appellants’ opening brief does not conform to the requirements of Rule VIII of Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal of the state of California. The appeal comes up on a typewritten record.

Under appellants’ opening brief filed herein, the only ground for reversal that we would be required to consider, in view of the rules of this court, is the alleged error of the trial court in giving instructions to the jury and in refusing instructions requested by them.

Appellants have presented in a supplement to their brief, all, or parts of nine of the instructions given, and four of the instructions which they proposed and which were refused. There were more than seventy instructions given. Instruction number two, requested by appellants and printed in the supplement, was upon the question of the preponderance of the evidence. Instruction number ten, given by the trial court, was upon the same subject and is not contained in the brief or the supplement thereto. Nowhere in the brief is the substance of any instruction stated. We have not gone through the numerous…