[1] Proceedings Supplementary to Execution—Third Party Claim —Unwarranted Order.—In a proceeding supplementary to execution, an order directing a third person who was not a party to the action but who has possession of goods belonging to the judgment debtor to deliver such goods to the judgment creditor, is wholly unwarranted where such party claims an interest in the goods.

[2] Id.—Warehouseman’s Lien—Adverse Claim.—One who claims a warehouseman’s lien on .property claims an interest in such property adverse to the owner.

[3] Id.—Determination op Bights op Parties—Procedure.—A person claiming property adverse to a judgment debtor is entitled to his day in court, with an opportunity for the determination of his rights in an ordinary action, as specified in section 720 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which provides that, in a proceeding supplementary to execution, if it appears that a person having property of the judgment debtor claims an interest therein adverse to such judgment debtor, the judgment creditor may maintain an action against such person for the recovery thereof; and the court may by order forbid a disposition or transfer of the property until, an action can be commenced and prosecuted to judgment.

[4] Id.—Order in Excess op Jurisdiction—Violation—Contempt.— Where, in a proceeding supplementary to execution, the court makes an order directing a third person to turn over to the judgment creditor property of the judgment debtor in which said third person claims an interest adverse to said judgment debtor, it acts in excess of its jurisdiction, and the violation of such order by said third person constitutes no warrant for adjudging such third person guilty of contempt and imposing punishment therefor.

PROCEEDING in prohibition to prevent the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and Grant Jackson, Judge thereof, from adjudging petitioner guilty of contempt for violation of an order issued in a proceeding supplementary to execution. Writ granted.