Kuck

Kuck v. McConnell

Good Law
1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 61·39 Cal. App. 266·178 P. 533
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 24, 1918Civ. No. 2636.California830 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sturtevant, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff. The facts of the case are, in brief, as follows:

On February 17, 1915, the plaintiff and defendant entered into a written agreement by which the plaintiff was to convey to defendant certain real property situated in Glenn County, California, and defendant was to pay therefor the sum of five thousand dollars cash and one thousand five hundred shares of preferred stock and one thousand five hundred shares of common stock of Consolidated Concessions Company, a corporation. Pursuant to this agreement, on March 17, 1916, a deed was executed by plaintiff and defendant delivered to him the sum of five thousand dollars, and the stock provided for in the agreement. Later, the plaintiff attempted to rescind the contract because of certain alleged false representations alleged to have been made by defendant, and brought this action for the recovery of the consideration paid by him under the contract.

The trial court found that the contract was procured through fraud and misrepresentation and a decree was entered accordingly, directing a restoration of the consideration from each party to the other.

The appellant contends first that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.