Bort

Bort v. Quadt

Good Law
1908 Cal. App. LEXIS 197·8 Cal. App. 290·96 P. 815
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 27, 1908Civ. No. 491.California416 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kerrigan, J.

This is an action for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant. The case was tried by a jury, which found for plaintiff, and judgment was accordingly entered. The defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

At the time of the accident the plaintiff was in the employ of the defendant as a journeyman painter, and was engaged with others in painting the Palace Hotel in San Francisco. On November 9, 1904, the second day of his employment, a staging on which he was suspended collapsed and fell to the sidewalk from a height of about forty feet, whereby plaintiff sustained serious personal injuries, crippling him for life. The cause of the accident was the breaking of a defective or inadequate sling to which was attached the staging used in painting the hotel. The staging consisted of a ladder, with planks placed upon it, and three “falls.” It was known as a “three-fall staging.” A “fall” consists of four ropes inserted in pulleys, and these ropes are attached to a ladder, and run from it to the roof of the building, where they are connected with the “sling.” The ladder, or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.