Blessing

Blessing v. Fetters

Good Law
1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 10·40 Cal. App. 471·181 P. 108
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 28, 1919Civ. No. 1905.California2,391 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Buck, J.

This is an action brought by a successor in interest of a tenant to recover from the landlord moneys deposited as security for the performance of the covenants of the lease, upon the claim that there had been an eviction of the tenant by the landlord and a consequent termination of the lease. With the foregoing cause of action there is joined a cause of action to recover the sum of $250 deposited by the tenant with the landlord at the time of the making of the lease, with the understanding that this sum should be returned by the landlord to the tenant at the termination of the lease upon the renewal of a certain liquor license in favor of the landlord.

The case was tried without a jury, and the court found that there was an eviction and that plaintiff was entitled to recover the $250 deposited to cover the saloon license, and also was entitled to recover the sum of one thousand dollars deposited as security for the performance of the covenants of the lease, less the sum of $350, being the damage caused by breach of covenant to take proper-care of the premises and goods leased. ‘Judgment accordingly in the sum of nine hundred dollars was given against defendants B'mma Fetters and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.