Ross

People v. Ross

Good Law
1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 34·60 Cal. App. 163·212 P. 627
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 16, 1922Crim. No. 914.California2,379 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Finlayson, J.

Defendant, who had previously been convicted of a felony, was charged by information filed in the superior court of Tulare County with carrying a pistol concealed upon his person, in violation of section 3 of the act of 1917, which reads: “Every person who candes in any city, city and county, town or municipal corporation of this state any pistol, revolver or other firearm concealed upon his person, without having a license to carry such firearm as hereinafter provided in section six of this act, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and if he has been convicted previously of any felony, or of any crime made punishable by this act, he is guilty of a felony.” Having been found guilty as charged in the information, defendant is now before this court on his appeal from the judgment.

The principal point relied on for a reversal is that the evidence is insufficient to justify the verdict. It seems that defendant, while standing in a street of the city of Tulare, produced from somewhere a pistol with which he repelled an attack made upon him by a man of the name of Jaynes. While standing beside an automobile belonging to one V. S. Jones, with his right arm, which had been broken, resting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.