Bledsoe

Quality Building & Securities Co. v. Bledsoe

Good Law
125 Cal. App. 493·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 691·14 P.2d 128
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 25, 1932Docket No. 1010.California3,516 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Harden, J.

By the first count of their complaint plaintiffs seek to rescind a contract of purchase of real property, for failure of consideration, and to recover from defendants the sum of $14,000, the purchase price; and by the second count they seek damages in the sum of $14,000, for breach of contract, if the rescission demanded in the first count cannot be had. The case was tried before the court and a jury. On motion, the court directed a verdict in favor of the defendants upon both counts, pursuant to which judgment was entered for defendants. No findings of fact or conclusions of law were made. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment.

The case turns on whether, in a transaction wherein defendants made a contract to convey real property to plaintiffs, defendants were obligated to convey and dedicate to the city of San Diego a designated lot, for park purposes, and bring about an acceptance of such conveyance and dedication.

On September 18, 1926, the Union Trust Company of San Diego held title, as trustee, to certain real property in San Diego, the beneficial ownership of which was vested in equal shares in H. R. Bledsoe and E. N. Young, defendants, as shown by declaration of trust No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.