Warfield

Ventura Manufacturing & Implement v. Warfield

Good Law
1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 285·37 Cal. App. 147·174 P. 382
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 3, 1918Civ. No. 1808.California6,409 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hart, J.

Plaintiff commenced the action to recover the sum of $1,967.50, and interest thereon, due on a promissory note, dated September 24, 1912, in favor of plaintiff and signed by defendant. In this note it was set forth that it was given in consideration of the sale by plaintiff to defendant of a “30 H. P. Pioneer Engine. ’ ’

The case was tried before a jury and judgment was entered in accordance with their verdict, as follows: That defendant was entitled to recover from the plaintiff the sum of one thousand five hundred dollars, paid by him on account of the purchase of the engine, together with interest thereon; that defendant was entitled to have said promissory note surrendered and canceled as though fully paid; and that plaintiff is entitled to the possession of said tractor. From said judgment plaintiff appeals.

The defendant interposed an answer to the complaint and also filed a cross-complaint and set up a counterclaim. The defendant by answer denies the vital averments of the complaint and sets up an affirmative defense, based upon alleged false representations by the plaintiff with respect to the character of the engine for capacity and durability, and relies upon the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.