Forsland

Forsland v. Forsland

Good Law
1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 786·46 Cal. App. 405·189 P. 327
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 3, 1920Civ. No. 3213.California1,266 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Gosbey, J.

This action arose out of the following facts: C. H. Forsland and Nance B. Forsland were, on the twenty-fifth day of September, 1917, husband and wife. Trouble and differences arose between them which subsequently resulted in their separation by a decree of divorce. Before the divorce was had and as a settlement of certain property rights they entered into the following written agreement:

On the first day of October, 1918, the plaintiff filed his complaint herein, alleging that he had deposited one thousand dollars with the Humboldt Savings Bank “upon the understanding and agreement with said Nance B. Forsland that she would return to said plaintiff certain documents, letters, papers, contracts and formulas for the making of paint, and also that the said defendant Nance B. Forsland should not disturb the peace of the said plaintiff or molest any employee of said plaintiff ’ ’; that said bank would pay the said sum of one thousand dollars to said Nance B. Forsland unless restrained by the court. Plaintiff further alleges “that ever since the execution of the said agreement as aforesaid the said Nance B. Forsland has willfully failed, refused and neglected to return to said…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.