Indrieri

People v. Indrieri

Good Law
1925 Cal. App. LEXIS 41·75 Cal. App. 672·243 P. 476
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 21, 1925Docket No. 1292.California1,987 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sturtevant, J.

The defendant was convicted on a charge of embezzlement. He made a motion for a new trial, the motion was denied, and he has appealed from the judgment of conviction and the order denying him a new trial.

On the twenty-eighth day of January, 1925, and for some time prior thereto, Mr. J. O. Traber was an attorney at law located at Fresno and engaged in the practice of the law at that place. The defendant was not an attorney at law admitted to practice in the courts of record of the state of .California, but he had offices with Mr. Traber. As stated in testimony by the defendant he was not a law partner of Mr. Traber, but he was a business partner. Mrs. Markese, a daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Zero, was one of the clerks in the office. The defendant is an Italian, but speaks the English language, as shown by his testimony contained in the transcript. Some time prior to the twenty-eighth day of January, 1925, an action was commenced in the superior court of Fresno County entitled Louis F. Ryan v. Jack Zero and Lucy Zero, Ms wife. It was a suit in equity brought by the plaintiff to obtain a decree declaring terminated a certain contract for the purchase and sale of real property. Among…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.