Barrios & Co. v. G. v. Pettigrew Co.

Good Law
1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 204·68 Cal. App. 139·228 P. 676
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 11, 1924Civ. No. 4793.California1,363 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sturtevant, J.

The plaintiff sued for and recovered a judgment for $1,483.41 alleged to be owing on a sales contract. The defendant has appealed from the judgment and has brought up the judgment-roll and a bill of exceptions.

The plaintiff pleaded its cause of action in three counts. In the first count it pleaded that within two years last past, at the city and county of San Francisco, state of California, defendant above named became and now is indebted to plaintiff above named in the sum of $1,433.25, being the difference between the purchase price of five cars of Sacramento Valley prunes purchased by plaintiff from defendant and the resale price of said prunes from plaintiff to defendant. The second count was based on an open book account, but at the close of the plaintiff’s case that count was dismissed. The third count pleaded an account stated. The defendant interposed an answer which contains specific denials, but does not plead any new matter. The trial court made findings in favor of the plaintiff in which it found on the first count and on the third count in favor of the plaintiff.

The bill of exceptions contains three memorandum contracts. By the first one, which is. dated February…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.