Eddy

Eddy v. Houghton

Good Law
6 Cal. App. 85·91 P. 397
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 8, 1907Civ. No. 363.California713 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Taggart, J.

Appeal from an order denying motion for change of venue.

The action was begun in Los Angeles county, and the application for change of place of trial was made by the defend-' ants P. T. Houghton and Merced Security Savings Bank. It was based upon the grounds that the cause of action related to a controversy over real property situated in the county of Mariposa, and the real defendant and party in interest (Houghton) was a resident of Mariposa county. Two demands for a change appear in the record, one by the defendant Merced Security Savings Bank, and the other by the defend ant Houghton, and the latter files an affidavit setting out that he is the only real party in interest as defendant in said action, and that all the other persons named as defendants are mere nominal parties. The defendant Tennessee-California Gold Mining Company, which joins the plaintiff in resisting the motion, files a verified answer presenting its interest in the subject matter of the action brought by plaintiff.

In determining the cause of action to be tried neither the affidavit nor the answer can be looked to. The effect of the complaint in this respect cannot be varied by either. Only as affecting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.