Jochimsen

Jochimsen v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
1921 Cal. App. LEXIS 486·54 Cal. App. 715·202 P. 902
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 28, 1921Civ. No. 3742.California1,199 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Conrey, J.

This action was brought to obtain an injunction restraining the city of Los Angeles, and the board of public service commissioners thereof, from increasing the rates charged for water furnished through and by means of its municipally owned water system, without the consent of the Railroad Commission of the state. The court having sustained a general demurrer to the complaint, judgment was entered in favor of the defendants. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment.

Only two questions are presented for decision. [1] Appellant first contends that by virtue of the constitution of the state of California, and the acts of the legislature, exclusive jurisdiction has been conferred upon the Railroad Commission to establish the rates to be charged in the sale of water as a publib utility; and that by consequence the city of Los Angeles, 'while engaged in the business of furnishing water to the public in said city, may charge only such rates as have been established by order of the Railroad Commission. The supreme court of California, in a decision covering this same question, has determined the matter adversely to the contentions of appellant here. For reasons fully set forth in that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.