Estate of Burns

Forrester v. Robbins

Good Law
115 Cal. App. 408·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 600·1 P.2d 995
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 9, 1931Docket No. 7775.California340 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

York, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment based upon a verdict rendered in response to the court’s order made in connection with an order granting proponents’ motion for a nonsuit.

An examination of the evidence discloses the fact that there was not sufficient evidence to show mental incapacity to make a will either on August 7, 1923, or on January 23, 1924, at the time when the will and codicil were executed. Also, that there was no evidence showing undue influence or irregularity of execution of the will, and the court was therefore justified in granting the motion for nonsuit on such grounds. The court was justified in directing the jury to return a verdict in favor of the proponents on the other issue, to wit, mental incapacity, and such verdict was properly brought in by the jury. The court was also justified in rendering its judgment based upon such verdict that the decedent Annie E. Burns was mentally competent to make a last will and testament on August 7, 1923, and was mentally competent to make a codicil to her last will and testament on January 3, 1924, and the court was further justified in making its orders that the last will and testament of Annie E. Burns, dated August 7,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.