Meyer

Meyer v. Johnson

Good Law
115 Cal. App. 646·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 759·2 P.2d 456
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 27, 1931Docket No. 6751.California1,934 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Works, J.

The complaint in this action purports to state two causes of action, each designed to recover on one of two policies of life insurance. We shall treat the controversy, in our discussion of it, as if there were but one cause of action, as the questions presented by the appeal are identical as to each of the two alleged causes.

Among other things it is alleged in the pleading of plaintiffs that Mary Meyer is administratrix of the estate of Hazel Edna Johnson, deceased, and the guardian of Robert William Paul, all as stated in the title to the action; that Robert Paul is a minor, the only living child and heir at law of Hazel Johnson; that on or about April 21, 1926, there was issued by defendant life insurance company and delivered to Hazel Johnson and defendant Granville William Johnson, her husband, a policy of insurance on the life of Hazel payable to Granville; that on or about May 2, 1926, Granville did unlawfully and feloniously kill and murder Hazel; that he was arrested, tried and convicted of the murder, in Arizona, and that judgment of death was pronounced by the court against him. .Judgment is prayed in the complaint here that the face of the policy and interest thereon…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.