Kettner

Kettner v. Shippey

Good Law
1908 Cal. App. LEXIS 189·8 Cal. App. 342·96 P. 912
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 29, 1908Civ. No. 491.California532 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Allen, J.

The complaint declares upon a promissory note, negotiable in form, executed by defendants to one Brown for $1,300 and interest. Alleges also its maturity, nonpayment and assignment and transfer, before the com mencement of the action, for a valuable consideration, to plaintiff, who is the owner and holder thereof. The answers deny the execution of the note, or that for a valuable consideration it was assigned or transferred to plaintiff by Brown, and allege that there was no consideration for its original execution.

Upon the trial the execution was admitted, and the court found that after maturity Brown assigned and transferred the note to plaintiff, who is now the lawful owner and holder thereof. The court further finds against defendants upon the issue as to consideration in the original execution.

Appellants contend for a reversal of the judgment because no finding is made in relation to the valuable character of the consideration for the assignment and transfer to plaintiff. Under the rule, the complaint must be construed as alleging transfer after maturity, from which it follows that in the action defendants were entitled to avail themselves of any defense which they could…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.