In Matter of Harkins
116 Cal. App. 769·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 410·3 P.2d 324
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 1931Docket No. 1644.California64 words
Lead Opinion
[1] It is the claim of the petitioner that the evidence is insufficient to support the order. The petitioner has presented no transcript of the testimony. The writ is denied under the authority of In re Rasmussen, 56 Cal.App. 368 [ 205 P. 72 ], and Brune v. Superior Court, 113 Cal.App. 21 [ 297 P. 566 ].
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.]