Nash

Nash v. Rosesteel

Good Law
1908 Cal. App. LEXIS 340·7 Cal. App. 504·94 P. 850
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 1908Civ. No. 434.California1,079 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shaw, J.

The plaintiff seeks to recover damages resulting from alleged false and fraudulent representations made by defendant to the plaintiff, whereby the latter was induced to buy certain corporate stock. At the time of the transaction complained of the United Wholesale Grocery Company was a corporation engaged in the wholesale grocery business, having an outstanding capital of $116,000, divided into eleven hundred and sixty shares of the par value of $100 each. Defendant owned three hundred shares of this stock and held the position of president of the company. Negotiations were entered into by the parties which, on May 1, 1902, resulted in a sale of the three hundred shares of stock to the plaintiff for the sum of $31,200.

Upon all material issues the court found in favor of the defendant and rendered judgment in accordance therewith. The appeal is from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, the sole ground urged therefor being that the findings are not supported by the evidence.

The evidence is conflicting, and appellant does not point out wherein any specific finding is not supported.

The court finds that defendant represented to plaintiff that a dividend of six per…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.