Scott

Scott v. Thomas

Good Law
1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 197·39 Cal. App. 401·179 P. 224
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 1919Civ. No. 2863.California1,308 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Thomas, J.

This is an appeal taken from a purported order denying defendant’s motion to vacate and set aside the judgment entered in favor of plaintiff. We have considered the whole record carefully. A statement of the facts, so far as material here, is as follows:

This action is one to quiet title to certain land. The trial of the ease in the court below was set for July 20, 1915. Defendant admits that he knew this. Defendant, in his affidavit to support his motion, says that he employed a certain firm of attorneys to represent him in this action; that this firm did represent him, filing an answer, etc., and had charge of the case up to about July 10,1914, at which time said firm notified him that because of other matters they would be compelled to withdraw from the case; that they did withdraw, and that because of such withdrawal he employed another attorney to represent him therein, who notified him that the case had been set for trial as stated above. The defendant, by said affidavit, says, among other things, that on the twentieth day of July, 1915, he was ill and unable to be in court, but that he sent his sister, Louisa Thomas, with his attorney, that she might assist him “in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.