McGuigan

McGuigan v. Millar

Good Law
117 Cal. App. 739·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 477·4 P.2d 607
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 28, 1931Docket No. 347.California4,198 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Barnard, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs to quiet their title to some 287 lots adjoining Hollywood, in the city of Los Angeles. The entire dispute is between plaintiff Alice McGuigan and defendant and respondent J. D. Millar and, for convenience, we will hereafter refer to them as if they were the only parties. The plaintiff claims title to these lots under two grant deeds, in both of which a bank formerly holding title to the lots as trustee, is the grantor. One deed covered 191 lots, which will hereafter be referred to as parcel A, and the other deed covered 96 lots, hereafter referred to as parcel B. It is admitted that about the time plaintiff acquired title to these lots in this manner, she gave to the defendant a so-called option to purchase the lots. It is defendant’s contention that this so-called option was and is in fact a mortgage representing an extension of a previous debt owed by him to the plaintiff, while plaintiff maintains that the instrument in question was merely an option to purchase, which option was not exercised by the defendant within the time limited, or at all.

Certain facts are not disputed, including the following: In 1911 the defendant borrowed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.