McDougall

McDougall v. Roberts

Good Law
1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 888·43 Cal. App. 553·185 P. 483
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 11, 1919Civ. No. 2995.California1,428 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kerrigan, J.

The complaint herein presents an action for damages based upon the fraud of defendants, one of whom was plaintiff’s attorney. It recites, in substance, that while plaintiff was sick in body and mind he was induced to transfer for a consideration of less than one hundred thousand dollars real and personal property worth $1,403,060. The complaint was filed about a year and a half after the transaction occurred, and was in three counts. The trial judge sustained defendants’ demurrer to the first and second counts of the second amended complaint, without leave to amend. As to the third count he granted plaintiff leave within fifteen days after notice to apply to the court on five days’ notice for leave to file an amended third count. In accordance with the leave so granted plaintiff served and asked leave to file his third amended complaint. The motion to amend was opposed by defendants upon the ground, among others, that the proposed complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; that said motion was not made in good faith, and that the allegations of the proposed amended complaint were sham and false.

Upon the hearing defendants offered and the court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.