Middlecoff

Middlecoff v. Durnal

Good Law
130 Cal. App. 119·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 953·19 P.2d 810
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 1933Docket No. 836.California884 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Barnard, J.

On November 18, 1922, the plaintiff entered into a written contract with one J. J. Kelly, providing in part as follows:

On November 27, 1922, the plaintiff herein filed a suit for Kelly, entitled Kelly v. Smith, seeking to quiet title to a number of lots, including those here in question. Upon a second trial of this action Kelly discharged Middleeoff and secured other counsel. About the same time, and on February 11, 1924, Middleeoff filed a complaint in intervention in the case of Kelly v. Smith, asking that upon entry of judgment he be declared the owner of an undivided one-half interest in the property. The original holders of title to the property had defaulted and the suit referred to was being defended by a corporation claiming to have a lien thereon. The claim of this corporation was compromised and on April 18, 1925, a deed was executed by the corporation conveying to Kelly the three lots involved in the action now before us. On April 25, 1925, Kelly deeded these three lots to lone Kelly, his wife. On May 4, 1925, a judgment was entered in the case of Kelly v. Smith, quieting Kelly’s title to these three lots. Thereafter, a new trial as to the interest of Middleeoff, as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.