In Re St. John
100 Cal. App. 477·1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 266·280 P. 181
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 1929Docket No. 1882.California73 words
Lead Opinion
THE COURT. [1] It appears that the evidence before the Superior Court, in the contempt proceeding, was sufficient to justify that court in finding that the defendant was then and there financially able to make the payments required of him by the court's order. ( In re Rasmussen, 56 Cal.App. 368 [ 205 P. 72 ].) It is therefore ordered that the petitioner be and he hereby is remanded to custody. *Page 478