Holstrom

Holstrom v. Mullen

Good Law
1927 Cal. App. LEXIS 293·84 Cal. App. 1·257 P. 545
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 15, 1927Docket No. 4533.California1,398 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Thompson, J.

Two actions were commenced by the plaintiff against the defendants, one seeking the recovery of damages for breach of contract and numbered in the superior court records 105,266 and the second designated by number 105,267, seeking to have a ten-year lease to a storeroom held by the defendants impressed with a trust in favor of the plaintiff. The complaint for damages alleges in addition to the fact of damage in a definite amount, that on or about August 10, 1921, plaintiff and defendants agreed that defendants should secure and take in their own names a lease on a storeroom in the Pacific Mutual building for the joint use and benefit of plaintiff and defendants; that plaintiff should have and enjoy the use and possession of the west half thereof; that during the months of September and October the plaintiff took possession of the west half and equipped it with special fixtures and a stock of merchandise, all of which was well known to the defendants; that about November 10, 1921, the defendants ejected plaintiff, although he had fully performed on his part and has always been ready, able, and willing to perform. The second complaint alleges practically the same matters except that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.