W. S. Smith & Son v. Industrial Accident Commission

Good Law
1925 Cal. App. LEXIS 367·72 Cal. App. 240·236 P. 962
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 10, 1925Docket No. 5159.California264 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Cashin, J.

Certiorari directed to the Industrial Accident Commission to review the proceedings resulting in an award made to Caroline H. Rountree and against Aetna Life Insurance Company, a corporation, the insurer of W. S. Smith & Son, the petitioners herein.

Caroline H. Rountree was on the first day of July, 1923, in the employ of petitioners W. S. Smith & Son. She alleged in her claim for compensation under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation, Insurance and Safety Act of 1917 that on that day in the course of her employment she fell from a horse, striking her head upon the ground, and receiving injuries which proximately caused a retinal hemorrhage in the left eye and permanent diminution of vision. The Commission made and filed its findings of fact and award in her favor against petitioner, Aetna Life Insurance Company, holding petitioner liable for the entire disability. Thereafter the Commission denied a rehearing of the matter.

Petitioners claim that the evidence does not justify the findings of fact, that the findings do not support the award, that the injuries, if any, were an aggravation of an existing disease, and that the Commission in holding petitioner liable for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.