Glenn

Colusa & Hamilton Railroad v. Glenn

Good Law
1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 357·35 Cal. App. 205·169 P. 423
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 5, 1917Civ. No. 1535.California844 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

This action is in eminent domain, and was initiated by the plaintiff for the purpose of condemning and thereby acquiring for its purposes a strip of land belonging to the defendant and comprising, as the jury found, 12.18 acres.

The jury assessed the damages for the land thus to be taken at the sum of $2,801.40 and for the land not taken, because of the depreciation in the value thereof by reason of its severance from the land proposed to be taken and the resulting damage, at the sum of $14,130. Upon the verdict so returned the court made and caused to be entered judgment, from which and from the order denying the plaintiff a new trial the latter appeals.

The tract of land from which the strip is sought to be taken in the present case adjoins the tract of land of which a portion, involving approximately the area sought to be taken in this ease, was condemned in the case of the Colusa & Hamilton R. R. Co. v. Leonard, 176 Cal. 109 , [ 167 Pac. 878 ]. Upon an examination of the records of the present and the said Leonard case, we have found that the physical conditions surrounding the two tracts of land are substantially if not precisely the same; that is to say, that the two…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.